The biggest drawback of the film, is that it's literally half a movie. I keep going back and forth between convincing myself that these saga and franchise films can't fully be judged before seeing the entire story play out. But then again, the point at the other side of the argument is, that even the acclaimed films that build into something massive, at least narratively, do seem to have a proper three-act structure and feel standalone alone enough. Even though lately it's become normal for us to leave theaters wanting more, while being in the constant hunger for these spectacular decade worth of storytelling to unfold, for quite some time I couldn't figure if that was what I was feeling after finishing Dune or if I were just frustrated. There's a thin line between those two, which became increasingly evident the longer I kept thinking about the film. So on the first viewing, one may think that some of the thematic goals in Dune come at a narrative expense. I couldn't help but somehow feel that the film elucidated itself in the form of visual innuendo, until it finally seemed running out of breath with only some ambitions realised. The issue isn't with the filmmaking, and the technical brilliance definitely makes it difficult to notice those structural flaws. Dune: Part One as it reads at the beginning, feels like a pure world-building movie. Imagine watching Harry Potter And The Philosopher's Stone for the first time; you're excited to step into this larger than life wizardly world. But then the credits start to roll right before Harry ventures into Hogwarts. But that's the thing, Dune works for the most part, because Villeneuve genuinely seems to understand this world and he wants us to be engrossed in it as well. So, it doesn't merely feel like a set-up movie because of the sheer talent and dedication, both on and off screen.